<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cellphone Bills Hung Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ribike.org/2009/06/11/cellphone-bills-hung-up/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ribike.org/2009/06/11/cellphone-bills-hung-up</link>
	<description>Working to make cycling in the Ocean State safer and more enjoyable for YOU</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Barta</title>
		<link>http://ribike.org/2009/06/11/cellphone-bills-hung-up/comment-page-1#comment-17115</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Barta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=832#comment-17115</guid>
		<description>Well said, Mark. 
 
The twin deterrents of suspension and revocation are seldom used. The beleaguered state is in the business of collecting fees from motorists in the form of gasoline taxes, property and sales taxes, and registrations, and, of course, many in Congress are full time employed by insurers, so all laws favor that industry. Thus, to clear overcrowded roads would not, in their minds, serve their best interests. Besides, who then would drive to Twin River to shore up the mismanagement there? 
 
Every attempt to introduce a viable public transportation system gets derailed. With reported 15% (really 50%) unemployment and nothing better to do, you can hardly drive anywhere during the day without considerable gridlock. If the EDC were to actually develop new industry, as they&#039;re supposed to, state wouldn&#039;t have to really on sin taxes to pay for boondoggles, like the billion they recently spent on only 5 miles of bad highways. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Mark.</p>
<p>The twin deterrents of suspension and revocation are seldom used. The beleaguered state is in the business of collecting fees from motorists in the form of gasoline taxes, property and sales taxes, and registrations, and, of course, many in Congress are full time employed by insurers, so all laws favor that industry. Thus, to clear overcrowded roads would not, in their minds, serve their best interests. Besides, who then would drive to Twin River to shore up the mismanagement there?</p>
<p>Every attempt to introduce a viable public transportation system gets derailed. With reported 15% (really 50%) unemployment and nothing better to do, you can hardly drive anywhere during the day without considerable gridlock. If the EDC were to actually develop new industry, as they&#039;re supposed to, state wouldn&#039;t have to really on sin taxes to pay for boondoggles, like the billion they recently spent on only 5 miles of bad highways. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://ribike.org/2009/06/11/cellphone-bills-hung-up/comment-page-1#comment-17081</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=832#comment-17081</guid>
		<description>Just because a bill is &quot;held for further study&quot; does NOT mean it is dead.  The leadership can bring it up any time they want.  Even better, the Senate bill S204A to ban texting when driving has already passed the Senate and ius now also in Hose Corporations.  When at the legislature yesterday, I actually talked to the House Corporations Chair, Brian Patrick Kennedy, about these bills and I would characterize his response as not closing the door on passing them.  It would help if others contacted the Corporations Committee and asked for a hearing on S204A.  These bills have the support of RIDOT and AAA, there is still a chance to pass them. 
 I don&#039;t think we can pass anything stronger this session.   
By the way, the RIDOT lobbyist told me RIDOT will not support the Gemma bill 5074 because they don&#039;t think it is enforcable at all.  Hwever he didn&#039;t seem all that familiar with the Sub A that was pssed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a bill is &quot;held for further study&quot; does NOT mean it is dead.  The leadership can bring it up any time they want.  Even better, the Senate bill S204A to ban texting when driving has already passed the Senate and ius now also in Hose Corporations.  When at the legislature yesterday, I actually talked to the House Corporations Chair, Brian Patrick Kennedy, about these bills and I would characterize his response as not closing the door on passing them.  It would help if others contacted the Corporations Committee and asked for a hearing on S204A.  These bills have the support of RIDOT and AAA, there is still a chance to pass them.</p>
<p> I don&#039;t think we can pass anything stronger this session.  </p>
<p>By the way, the RIDOT lobbyist told me RIDOT will not support the Gemma bill 5074 because they don&#039;t think it is enforcable at all.  Hwever he didn&#039;t seem all that familiar with the Sub A that was pssed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dieterich</title>
		<link>http://ribike.org/2009/06/11/cellphone-bills-hung-up/comment-page-1#comment-17069</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dieterich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bikeprovidence.org/?p=832#comment-17069</guid>
		<description>According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aurorasentinel.com/articles/2009/06/12/news/doc4a316f2869a28216171644.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt;, Colorado just passed a no texting law.  Unfortunately, they seem to have the same problem passing reasonable laws as well, since 
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
The bill is a scaled-down version of legislation that would have banned all hands-on cell phone use by drivers in Colorado. Under the original bill, hands-free calling would have been permitted. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
What is it going to take in this country for people to realize that when you get behind the wheel of a car, you are RESPONSIBLE for your actions.  It&#039;s NOT okay to drive in a manner that could endanger other people, be them another motorist, a pedestrian, or a cyclist.  We need to make it tougher to get a license in this country and tougher penalties for when people break laws! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.aurorasentinel.com/articles/2009/06/12/news/doc4a316f2869a28216171644.txt" rel="nofollow">this article</a>, Colorado just passed a no texting law.  Unfortunately, they seem to have the same problem passing reasonable laws as well, since</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The bill is a scaled-down version of legislation that would have banned all hands-on cell phone use by drivers in Colorado. Under the original bill, hands-free calling would have been permitted.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What is it going to take in this country for people to realize that when you get behind the wheel of a car, you are RESPONSIBLE for your actions.  It&#039;s NOT okay to drive in a manner that could endanger other people, be them another motorist, a pedestrian, or a cyclist.  We need to make it tougher to get a license in this country and tougher penalties for when people break laws! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

